<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://wiki.swganh.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Item_Repair_Source_4_%28Source%29</id>
		<title>Item Repair Source 4 (Source) - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://wiki.swganh.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Item_Repair_Source_4_%28Source%29"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.swganh.org/index.php?title=Item_Repair_Source_4_(Source)&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-06T01:24:45Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.26.4</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.swganh.org/index.php?title=Item_Repair_Source_4_(Source)&amp;diff=53008&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ready: New page: I just did the clothing repair experiment again. This time I used ribbed shirts since they are easier for me to make in the factory, but I don't think this should make a huge difference. I...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.swganh.org/index.php?title=Item_Repair_Source_4_(Source)&amp;diff=53008&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2009-06-14T21:14:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: I just did the clothing repair experiment again. This time I used ribbed shirts since they are easier for me to make in the factory, but I don&amp;#039;t think this should make a huge difference. I...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;I just did the clothing repair experiment again. This time I used ribbed shirts since they are easier for me to make in the factory, but I don't think this should make a huge difference. It looks like they made the chance of repair much better for non-crafters and at the same time made repair for a master crafter much worse if they are using good tools compared to before. I am not sure if this was intended or not. Anyway, it looks like we still have a bonus, but it isn't nearly as large. I have copied this from my previous results, but I am adding the new results in red.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eimi (20% repair tool)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Complete Failure(1/1) - 44% 7%&lt;br /&gt;
Marginal(660/660) - 40% 48%&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced Condition - 16% 16%&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect - 0% 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eimi (99.7% repair tool)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Complete Failure(1/1) - 12% 4%&lt;br /&gt;
Marginal(660/660) - 16% 16%&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced Condition - 16% 72%&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect - 64% 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momoko (20% repair tool)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Complete Failure(1/1) - 40% 4%&lt;br /&gt;
Marginal(660/660) - 28% 36%&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced Condition(800/800) - 24% 40%&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect(950/950) - 8% 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momoko(99.7% repair tool)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Complete Failure(1/1) - 0% 0%&lt;br /&gt;
Marginal(660/660) - 4.2% 8%&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced Condition(800/800) - 4.2% 56%&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect(950/950) - 91.6% 36%&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ready</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>