Difference between revisions of "ResourceWeights (00000207)"
(→comments) |
(→comments) |
||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
Original Quality 100 % | Original Quality 100 % | ||
− | + | {| class="wikitable" | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | 04 | ||
+ | :01 | ||
+ | ::81 | ||
+ | :01 | ||
+ | ::81 | ||
+ | :01 | ||
+ | ::81 | ||
+ | :01 | ||
+ | ::81 | ||
+ | | | ||
04 | 04 | ||
:01 | :01 | ||
Line 125: | Line 128: | ||
:01 | :01 | ||
::81 | ::81 | ||
− | + | |} | |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
Revision as of 11:06, 23 March 2007
Struct
Variable DescriptionscontrollerID = 00000207 |
Tags
commentsnow that gave me some serious headaches kudos to htx for figuring it out. The main problem has been the number of resource weights/assembly weights pairs. For the gas tool for example 4 pairs are needed.
and their weighting. The following properties have been found so far :
Several resource attributes are added through multiple bytes. Initial the weighting will be distributed equally through all attributes. The weighting is happening through setting / unsetting bit 1 and two. In the examples I have looked at so far only the last dataset of the assembly weights part was of importance. So to see a few examples : Original Quality 100 %
|