Difference between revisions of "Force Lightning Single 1 (Ability)"
(→Related Tags) |
(→Ability Multipliers) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Related Tags == | == Related Tags == | ||
{| | {| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||{{D0%}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
||{{Ability}} | ||{{Ability}} | ||
Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
= Ability Breakdown & Details = | = Ability Breakdown & Details = | ||
+ | A 32m ranged single target electric damage attack. Don't have data on lightning 1 abilities so will assume the dmg is half that of lighting 2. 1200-2400 damage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Force lightning should be considered as Force Power attacks. Their accuracy modifiers are only compared against the target’s Force Defenses. Defense Versus and Jedi State Defenses are not factored in, if the attack hits then the state is automatically applied. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | No formula has been devised for this but I propose the following: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ChancetoHit = ( 0.75 x ( forceLightningAccuracy / 100 ) ) - | ||
+ | |||
+ | ( 0.5 x (defendersForceDefenseMod / 100 ) ) ) ) | ||
+ | |||
+ | This makes it so a master defender has a chance to greatly reduce the accuracy of this attack%. We could perhaps tweak it to set the defender multiplier to 0.25 if this is too much, although I suppose it would defeat the purpose of having defender if it did not significantly affect the accuracy/damage of force attacks by master level, although there is also the issue with dabblers taking up the defense line and being almost as powerful as a master. | ||
Line 67: | Line 81: | ||
|- align="center" | |- align="center" | ||
|| | || | ||
− | + | forcelightningsingle1_block | |
|| | || | ||
/string/en/ | /string/en/ | ||
Line 74: | Line 88: | ||
|| | || | ||
internal_command_string | internal_command_string | ||
− | || | + | ||You direct an arc of lightning towards %TT for %DI points of damage, but %ST blocks it! |
− | You | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightning towards you for %DI points of damage, but you block it! |
− | || | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightning towards %TT for %DI points of damage, but %ST blocks it! |
− | %TU | + | |
− | || | + | |
− | %TU | + | |
|- align="center" | |- align="center" | ||
− | || | + | ||forcelightningsingle1_counter |
|| | || | ||
/string/en/ | /string/en/ | ||
Line 90: | Line 104: | ||
|| | || | ||
internal_command_string | internal_command_string | ||
− | || | + | ||You direct an arc of lightning towards %TT for %DI points of damage, but %ST counterattacks! |
− | You | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightninge towards you for %DI points of damage, but you counterattack! |
− | || | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightning towards %TT for %DI points of damage, but %ST counterattacks! |
− | %TU | + | |
− | || | + | |
− | %TU | + | |
|- align="center" | |- align="center" | ||
− | || | + | ||forcelightningsingle1_evade |
||/string/en/ | ||/string/en/ | ||
||cbt_spam.stf | ||cbt_spam.stf | ||
||internal_command_string | ||internal_command_string | ||
− | ||You | + | ||You direct an arc of lightning towards %TT for %DI points of damage, but %ST evades it. |
− | ||%TU | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightning towards you for %DI points of damage, but you evade it. |
− | ||%TU | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightning towards %TT for %DI points of damage, but %ST evades it. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
|- align="center" | |- align="center" | ||
− | || | + | ||forcelightningsingle1_hit |
||/string/en/ | ||/string/en/ | ||
||cbt_spam.stf | ||cbt_spam.stf | ||
||internal_command_string | ||internal_command_string | ||
− | ||You | + | ||You direct an arc of lightning towards %TT for %DI points of damage! |
− | ||%TU | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightning towards you for %DI points of damage! |
− | ||%TU | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightning towards %TT for %DI points of damage! |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
|- align="center" | |- align="center" | ||
− | || | + | ||forcelightningsingle1_miss |
||/string/en/ | ||/string/en/ | ||
||cbt_spam.stf | ||cbt_spam.stf | ||
||internal_command_string | ||internal_command_string | ||
− | || | + | ||You direct an arc of lightning towards %TT but miss. |
− | ||%TU | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightning towards you but misses. |
− | ||%TU | + | ||%TU directs an arc of lightning towards %TT but misses. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
Line 194: | Line 215: | ||
||Damage||align="center" |0 | ||Damage||align="center" |0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ||Delay Time||align="center" | | + | ||Delay Time||align="center" |4 |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
|} | |} | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 08:19, 23 September 2007
Ability - Force Lightning Single 1
SWGANH Wiki is a repository of Star Wars Galaxies Developer information. This site is only meant to be used by SWGANH Developer team.
Description/forceLightningSingle1 <target>: This attack allows a Jedi to direct an arc of electricity to the target.
|
Related Tags
|
Ability Breakdown & Details
A 32m ranged single target electric damage attack. Don't have data on lightning 1 abilities so will assume the dmg is half that of lighting 2. 1200-2400 damage.
Force lightning should be considered as Force Power attacks. Their accuracy modifiers are only compared against the target’s Force Defenses. Defense Versus and Jedi State Defenses are not factored in, if the attack hits then the state is automatically applied.
No formula has been devised for this but I propose the following:
ChancetoHit = ( 0.75 x ( forceLightningAccuracy / 100 ) ) -
( 0.5 x (defendersForceDefenseMod / 100 ) ) ) )
This makes it so a master defender has a chance to greatly reduce the accuracy of this attack%. We could perhaps tweak it to set the defender multiplier to 0.25 if this is too much, although I suppose it would defeat the purpose of having defender if it did not significantly affect the accuracy/damage of force attacks by master level, although there is also the issue with dabblers taking up the defense line and being almost as powerful as a master.
Ability Flow
System MessagesSUI PromptCombat Chat Spam
Fly TextFormula(s)
Source References
|
Ability HAM Costs
Ability Multipliers
|