Difference between revisions of "ResourceWeights (00000207)"
(→comments) |
(→comments) |
||
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | and finally OQ 75% PE 25% | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| class="wikitable" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |resource weights | ||
+ | |assembly weights | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | 04 | ||
+ | :01 81 | ||
+ | :01 81 | ||
+ | :01 81 | ||
+ | :01 81 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | 04 | ||
+ | :01 81 | ||
+ | :01 81 | ||
+ | :01 81 | ||
+ | :02 83 71 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
Revision as of 11:20, 23 March 2007
Struct
Variable DescriptionscontrollerID = 00000207 |
Tags
commentsnow that gave me some serious headaches kudos to htx for figuring it out. The main problem has been the number of resource weights/assembly weights pairs. For the gas tool for example 4 pairs are needed.
and their weighting. The following properties have been found so far :
Several resource attributes are added through multiple bytes. Initial the weighting will be distributed equally through all attributes. The weighting is happening through setting / unsetting bit 1 and two. In the examples I have looked at so far only the last dataset of the assembly weights part was of importance. So to see a few examples : Original Quality 100 %
OQ 50 % PE 50%
OQ 66 % PE 33%
and finally OQ 75% PE 25%
|