Difference between revisions of "ResourceWeights (00000207)"
(→comments) |
(→comments) |
||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
|A1||'''Unit Toughness ''' | |A1||'''Unit Toughness ''' | ||
− | |B1||''' | + | |B1||'''Bulk (???) ''' |
|- | |- | ||
|??||'''Entangle Resistance''' | |??||'''Entangle Resistance''' | ||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
| | | | ||
Line 153: | Line 154: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
| | | | ||
Line 178: | Line 180: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
| | | |
Revision as of 11:50, 23 March 2007
Struct
Variable DescriptionscontrollerID = 00000207 |
Tags
commentsnow that gave me some serious headaches kudos to htx for figuring it out. The main problem has been the number of resource weights/assembly weights pairs. For the gas tool for example 4 pairs are needed.
and their weighting. The following properties have been found so far :
Several resource attributes are added through multiple bytes. Initial the weighting will be distributed equally through all attributes. The weighting is happening through setting / unsetting bit 1 and two. In the examples I have looked at so far only the last dataset of the assembly weights part was of importance. So to see a few examples :
|
OQ 50 % PE 50%
|
OQ 66 % PE 33%
| and finally OQ 75% PE 25%
|